I start off this weeks blog with a quote from Bill Kerr; It seems to me that each _ism constructivism, behaviorism, cognitivism and now a new one, Connectivism is offering something useful without any of them being complete or stand alone in their own right. Learning theories allow theorist to take sides and draw conclusions or explain what happens when learning takes place.
Behaviorism driving forces is based on stimulus response. Although this is a key aspect to learning, there are other isms that open other avenues to learning. In favor of cognitivism and Connectivism, I disagree with Stephen Downes views that the mind is not like a computer. Much like the human memory system, computer systems are centered on processing and retrieving information, storing and accessing data. I am not alluding to the fact that the mind is exactly like a computer but the two display similar characteristics. Cognitivism theoretically bases its principals from an internal mental processing state, which in my opinion correlates with Connectivism which expands learning from a single mind to a connection of learners or networks that provide knowledge across various fields, ideas, and specialized information sources.
The notion that over years of development, one theory replaces another is incorrect. As society evolves the way we view education should evolve as well. Ideas are not simply replaced but enhances. Thus like learning theories, research on how one learns evolves with new concepts and ideas that build upon the existing theories.